by Tim B Hunter, MD, MSc
Internal Fixation continued...
Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes
Fractures, tumors, or infections can create significant bone loss with large bony defects. These may produce disabling injuries which can limit healing, affect weight bearing, and lead to loss of joint or limb function. To fill in these bony voids and promote bony healing, bone grafts are frequently used. Orthopedic surgeons perform at least 500,000 bone-grafting procedures
annually in the United States alone. Bone grafting may be done immediately
after an injury or after an interval during which the host site is
prepared for the grafting (Ruedi, 2007; Parikh, 2002).
The best bone grafts are taken directly from the patient, so-called autogenous (autograft) bone grafting. Such grafts are composed of cancellous, corticocancellous, or
cortical bone. The graft is either a free graft of bone with no attached soft tissue or a vascularized graft of bone with attached muscle and subcutaneous tissue (figure: fibular mandibular reconstruction; figure: calcaneus iliac crest autograft). The most frequent donor
site for autogenous cancellous bone grafting is the iliac
bone. Although autogenous bone grafting is the preferred method and bone graft
has significant limitations. These include finding a large enough supply of bone without producing significant donor site
the inability of the autogenous graft tissue to be fabricated into
Allografts (tissue grafts between
donor and recipient of the same species but
of disparate genotypes) are also commonly used (figure: cadaver limb sparing allograft; figure: tibia allografts). These represent treated cadaver bone from the donor bone bank. The
disadvantages associated with allografts include possible disease transmission, immunogenicity concerns, poor biologic and mechanical properties, increased cost, and unavailability worldwide due to financial and cultural issues (Ruedi, 2007; Hunter, 2003; Parikh, 2002).
The considerable limitations associated with autografts
and allografts have prompted increased
interest in alternative bone graft substitutes. The
development and use of bone graft substitutes is a
burgeoning field (Beaman, 2006). Indications for use of bone graft substitutes
include fracture augmentation, vertebroplasty,
augmentation of defects associated with
benign or malignant bone lesions, fracture nonunion, and osteomyelitis (figure: enchondroma treatment; figure: buttress plate with bone substitute; figure: metastatic renal cell carcinoma treatment).
The main types of commercially
available bone graft substitutes are demineralized
allograft bone matrix, ceramics and ceramic composites,
composite grafts of collagen and mineral, coralline hydroxyapatite, calcium phosphate cement, bioactive glass, and calcium sulfate (Hunter, 2003; Parikh, 2002; Larsson, 2002; Petruskevicius, 2002; Wilkins, 1999; Robinson, 1999; Ladd, 1999; Beaman, 2006; Bhatt, 2012). These are fairly common and can resemble a normal bony structure (figure: Puddu titanium plate with hydroxyapatite bone graft wedge). Recent preclinical and bio-mechanical studies with bioactive cements are also
(Hunter, 2003; Larsson, 2002; Kurien, 2013).
For infected fracture sites as well as for treatment
of bone infections, antibiotic beads and antibiotic spacers or antibiotic rods are frequently
used. The beads, spacers, and rods are typically composed
of polymethyl methacrylate cement containing an antibiotic which diffuses locally into the infected bone when the beads, spacers, or rods are
packed into the region of infection. The bead
packing cement material also provides mechanical support in
areas of missing or weakened bone (figure: antibiotic beads). Cement impregnated antibiotic
spacers and antibiotic paste are used mainly after resection of
infected joint arthroplasty sites. Antibiotic
impregnated calcium sulfate pellets are also used in the treatment of osteomyelitis (Sherry, 2001).
In many cases it can be difficult to differentiate between autogenous bone grafts and allografts. It is also often difficult to differentiate between the various bone substitutes, autogenous or allogenic bone grafts, and antibiotic impregnated cement grafts if sufficient history is not supplied. One should be aware of these different possibilities and recognize when there has been placement of a bone-like structure or material that is probably not a bony fragment from the region of injury, tumor, or infection. Deciding between the various possibilities of bone grafts, bone substitutes, and antibiotic impregnated cement materials can sometimes be helped by the radiographic appearance of the bony site and the clinical picture.
Back to Top
Back to Top
Carbon Fiber Implants
Carbon fibers (CF) are used in multiple applications - aerospace systems, civil engineering projects, automotive components, lighting filaments, sporting goods, and surgical implants. Their widespread use derives from their many unique physical, chemical, and biological properties, including high heat tolerance, high strength to weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and conductivity (Hillock, 2014). Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) is a combination of carbon fibers and polyethylene. Variations on carbon fibers also include carbon reinforced plastic (CRP), carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics (CFRTP) and carbon fiber polyether ether ketone (CF-PEEK).
The industrial applications for carbon fibers rivals that for metals and polymers. One of the major disadvantages of carbon fibers are their cost. They are expensive compared to similar metallic elements on a unit mass basis. They cannot be be easily recycled and melted down as can most metals. Recycled carbon fiber materials have reduced fiber lengths which limits their possible applications (Hillock, 2014).
Carbon fiber medical applications are quite diverse ranging from dental orthodontics to fracture fixation plates and limb sparing prostheses (figure: carbon fiber humerus fixation plate) (Hillock, 2014; Hak, 2014). Some of the applications for carbon fiber devices in orthopedic surgery include carbon fiber cervical disk cages, lumbar spine fixation apparatus, and humerus fixation plates (Hak, 2014). Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK tibial nail, dynamic compression plate, proximal humeral plate, and distal volar plate compare favorably to more standard metallic commercially available orthopedic trauma implants (Steinberg, 2013).
Carbon fiber composites more closely mimic the elasticity of bone with a longer fatigue life. Carbon fiber plates and nails are commonly used with titanium screws. Carbon fiber plates and nails are radiolucent on radiographs and produce few artifacts on CT or MRI imaging with minor distortions from the titanium screws. One disadvantage of carbon fiber materials compared to metallic implants is they cannot be bent to the shape of the bone like metallic implants.
CarboFix Orthopedics Ltd (Herzeliya, Israel) and Invibio (West Conshohocken, PA) are two companies specializing in implants made of carbon fibers. CarboFix products include a pedicle screw system made of carbon fiber reinforced polymer with an ultrathin titanium shell, fixation plates for the distal fibula, distal femur, distal radius, and proximal humerus. For example, CarboFix "Piccolo" proximal humeral plates are anatomically shaped for the right and left humerus. They are radiolucent and contain a radiopaque marking outlining the plate (figure: carbon fiber humerus fixation plate; figure: carbon fiber volar radius fixation plate). Invibio manufactures "PEEK-OPTIMA" polymers for multiple uses including hip and knee arthroplasties.
Carbon fiber implants will become more common as their cost is reduced. They currently constitute a very small portion of fracture fixation and joint arthroplasty devices, but their use is expected to expand rapidly, particularly if other manufacturers start introducing carbon fiber based products into their commercial offerings.
Back to Top