Medical Apparatus: Imaging Guide to Orthopedic Devices

References - Introduction


Imaging Protocols


Medical devices: legal, regulatory, and quality assurance considerations


Medical Device Manufacturers



Imaging Protocols: References & Useful Links


Li H., et al. Metal artifact suppression from reformatted projections in multi-slice helical CT using dual-front active contours. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009. 2009: p. 993-996.

Buckwalter KA, Lin C, Ford JM. Managing postoperative artifacts on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2011; 15(4): 309-319.

Watzke O, Kalender, WA. A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images. Eur Radiol 2004; 14(5): 849-856.

Flohr TG et al. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. Med Phys 2005; 32(8): 2536-2547.

Buckwalter KA. Optimizing imaging techniques in the postoperative patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2007; 11(3): 261-272.

White LM, Buckwalter KA. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002; 6(1): 5-17.

Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177(2): 285-287.

Biswas D, et al. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(8): 1882-1889.

Ohashi K, El-Khoury GY. Musculoskeletal CT: recent advances and current clinical applications. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47(3): 387-409.

Buckwalter KA, et al. Multichannel CT Imaging of Orthopedic Hardware and Implants. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006; 10(1): 86-97.

Calhoun, PS, et al. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 1999; 19(3): 745-764.

Fayad LM, Patra A, Fishman EK. Value of 3D CT in defining skeletal complications of orthopedic hardware in the postoperative patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(4): 1155-1163.

Chiro GD, et al. Tissue signatures with dual-energy computed tomography. Radiology 1979; 131(2): 521-523.

Coupal TM, et al. Peering through the glare: using dual-energy CT to overcome the problem of metal artefacts in bone radiology. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43(5): 567-575.

Nicolaou S, et al. Dual-energy CT as a potential new diagnostic tool in the management of gout in the acute setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194(4): 1072-1078.

Johnson TR, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007; 17(6): 1510-1517.

Takahashi N, et al. Dual-energy CT iodine-subtraction virtual unenhanced technique to detect urinary stones in an iodine-filled collecting system: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190(5): 1169-1173.

Boll DT, et al. Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition--pilot study. Radiology 2009; 250(3): 813-820.

Alvarez RE, Macovski A. Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography. Phys Med Biol 1976; 21(5): p. 733-744.

Meinel FG, et al. Metal artifact reduction by dual-energy computed tomography using energetic extrapolation: a systematically optimized protocol. Invest Radiol 2012; 47(7): 406-414.

Back to Top

Lee YH, et al. Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software. Eur Radiol 2012; 22(6): 1331-1340.

Pessis E, et al. Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. Radiographics 2013; 33(2): 573-583.

Bamberg F, et al. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol 2011; 21(7): 1424-1429.

Yu L, Leng S, McCollough CH. Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199(5 Suppl): S9-S15.

Farber GL, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995. 20(13): 1494-1499.

Laine T, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J 1997; 6(6): 402-405.

Krestan CR, et al. MDCT versus digital radiography in the evaluation of bone healing in orthopedic patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186(6): 1754-1760.

Grigoryan M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of closed fracture healing using computed tomography and conventional radiography. Acad Radiol 2003; 10(11): 1267-1273.

Naudie DD, Rorabeck CH. Sources of osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: wear of the bearing surface. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 251-259.

Chiang PP, et al. Osteolysis of the pelvis: evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 417: 164-174.

Claus AM, et al. Computed tomography to assess pelvic lysis after total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 422: 167-174.

Ohashi K, et al. Orthopedic hardware complications diagnosed with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2005; 237(2): 570-577.

Taljanovic MS, et al. Joint arthroplasties and prostheses. Radiographics 2003; 23(5): 1295-1314.

Lonstein JE, et al. Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81(11): 1519-1528.

Clarke HD, Math KR, Scuderi GR. Polyethylene post failure in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(5): 652-657.

Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. Radiographics 2006; 26(1): 275-297.

Singh DR, Chin MS, Peh, WC. Artifacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2014; 18(1): 12-22.

Peh WC, Chan JH. Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30(4): 179-191.

Taber KH, et al. Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine. Radiographics 1998; 18(6): 1499-1521.

Wood ML, Henkelman RM. MR image artifacts from periodic motion. Med Phys 1985; 12(2): 143-151.

Back to Top

Morelli JN, et al. An image-based approach to understanding the physics of MR artifacts. Radiographics 2011; 31(3): 849-866.

Rubin JB, Wright A, Enzmann DR. Lumbar spine: motion compensation for cerebrospinal fluid on MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 167(1): 225-231.

Quint DJ, et al. Importance of absence of CSF pulsation artifacts in the MR detection of significant myelographic block at 1.5 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10(5): 1089-1095.

Larsen DW, Teitelbaum GP, Norman D. Cerebrospinal fluid flow artifact. A possible pitfall on fast-spin-echo MR imaging of the spine simulating intradural pathology. Clin Imaging 1996; 20(2): 140-142.

Arena L, Morehouse HT, Safir J. MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them. Radiographics 1995; 15(6): 1373-1394.

Czervionke LF, et al. Characteristic features of MR truncation artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151(6): 1219-1228.

Levy LM, et al. Spinal cord artifacts from truncation errors during MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 166(2): 479-483.

Bronskill MJ, et al. Syrinx-like artifacts on MR images of the spinal cord. Radiology 1988; 166(2): 485-488.

Turner DA, et al. Truncation artifact: a potential pitfall in MR imaging of the menisci of the knee. Radiology 1991; 179(3): 629-633.

Breger RK, et al. Truncation artifact in MR images of the intervertebral disk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988; 9(5): 825-828.

Hyde JS, et al. Quadrature detection surface coil. Magn Reson Med 1987; 4(2): 179-184.

Mitchell DG. MRI principles. 1999, Philadelphia: Saunders. xiii, 277 p.

Beltran LS, Bencardino JT, Steinbach LS. Postoperative MRI of the shoulder. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014; 40(6): 1280-1297.

Raphael B, et al. MRI comparison of periprosthetic structures around zirconium knee prostheses and cobalt chrome prostheses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186 (6): 1771-1777.

Lu W, et al. SEMAC: Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62(1): 66-76.

Sofka CM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (406): 129-135.

Potter HG, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004; 86-A(9): 1947-1954.

Hargreaves BA, et al. Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(3): 547-555.

den Harder JC, et al. Off-resonance suppression for multispectral MR imaging near metallic implants. Magn Reson Med 2014; Jan 31. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25126. [Epub ahead of print].

Koch KM, et al. A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61(2): 381-390.

Back to Top

Sutter R, et al. Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging. Radiology 2012; 265(1): 204-214.

Liebl H, et al. In vitro assessment of knee MRI in the presence of metal implants comparing MAVRIC-SL and conventional fast spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T field strength. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014; 2014 Jun 10. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24668. [Epub ahead of print].

Carl M, Koch K, Du J. MR imaging near metal with undersampled 3D radial UTE-MAVRIC sequences. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69(1): 27-36.

Ostlere S. How to image metal-on-metal prostheses and their complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(3): 558-567.

Wiles P. The surgery of the osteoarthritic hip. Br J Surg 1958; 45(193): 488-497.

Sochart DH, Porter ML The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79(11): 1599-1617.

Hayter CL, et al. MRI findings in painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199(4): 884-893.

Bestic JM, Berquist TH. Current concepts in hip arthroplasty imaging: metal-on-metal prostheses, their complications, and imaging strategies. Semin Roentgenol 2013; 48(2): 178-186.

Clayton RA, et al. Inflammatory pseudotumor associated with femoral nerve palsy following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90(9): 1988-1993.

Mahendra G, et al. Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(6): 653-659.

Pandit H, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 847-851.

Grammatopoulos G, et al. The relationship between head-neck ratio and pseudotumour formation in metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(11): 1527-1534.

De Haan R, et al. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(9): 1158-1163.

Glyn-Jones S, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacin. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(12): 1566-1574.

Kwon YM, et al. "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(4): 511-518.

Chen Z, et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings--a radiological perspective. Eur Radiol 2011; 21(3): 485-491.

Anderson H, et al. Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40(3): 303-307.

Choi S-J, Koch KM, Hargreaves BA, Stevens KJ, Gold GE. Metal artifact reduction with MAVRIC SL at 3-T MRI in patients with hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: 140-147.

Talbot BS, Weinberg EP. MR imaging with metal-suppression sequences for evaluation of total joint arthroplasty. Radiographics 2016; 36: 209-225.

Back to top

Useful Links

American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons

American College of Radiology (ACR) (Reston, VA)

American Dental Association (Chicago, IL)

American Medical Association (AMA) (Chicago, IL)

Device Manufacturers

(FDA) United States Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Databases (Washington, DC)

FDA - Dental Devices

MRI Questions

MRI Safety Information

MRI World

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement

Orthopedic Hardware Atlas

Ortho Atlas


Questions and Answers in MRI


United States Patent and Trademark Office


Back to top

Author contact information

Tim Hunter

All Rights Reserved

Publisher Contact Information

Main office: USA (New York)
Cambridge University Press
32 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10013-2473

Phone: (212) 337-5000