Orthopedic Devices
|
|
|
|
Internal Fixation - nails and rods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fracture Fixation continued...
by Tim B Hunter, MD, MSc
Internal Fixation continued...
Plates continued....
Fixation plates can also be described as locking or non-locking. Non-locking plates stabilize the bone fragments by use of the friction between the plate and the bone, which is generated by screws compressing the two bony surfaces together. Locking plates use screws attached to the plate in a rigid fixed-angle fashion using threads in the screw head and/or the plate hole (AAOS, 2008). Locking plates are more resistant to failure from screw loosening and pull out. All the screws locked to a bone fragment are locked to the plate at a fixed angle. For the plate to fail, the screws must pull out as a unit. Locking plates may be advantageous in osteoporotic bone with thin cortices, such as in the proximal humerus, distal femur, and proximal tibia. The use of locking versus non-locking designs is up to the individual surgeon with non-locking designs being considered more traditional. There are no statistically significant differences between locking plates and non-locking plates in patient outcomes (AAOS, 2008).
Very commonly, terms such as 3.5 mm, 3.5 plate, 3.5 mm plate, 4.5 mm, 4.5 plate, or 4.5 mm plate are used. These refer to the diameter in millimeters (mm) of the screws used to secure the plate into bone. The size of a bone plate can refer to its length or thickness as well as to the size of the screws accommodated in its holes. The size of the screws is the most commonly used parameter for describing a fracture fixation plate size. Plate size is sometimes also described by the number of screw holes in the plate.
Intramedullary Nails/Rods
Intramedullary nailing was introduced by Gerhard
Kuntscher (1900-1972) in 1940 and represented a revolution
in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
Since that time, the technique has evolved considerably
(Ruedi, 2007; Benjamin, 1994; Wiss, 2013; Berquist, 1995; Freiberg, 2001; Hunter, 2001; Ajmal, 2001; Oh, 2002). Intramedullary nailing is
the standard treatment for diaphyseal fractures of
the femur and tibia (figure: intramedullary rods/nails; figure: antegrade intramedullary hip nail; figure: tibial intramedullary nail). Humeral shaft
fractures are also being treated with antegrade
and retrograde intramedullary nailing, with variable
complication rates being reported (figure: humerus intramedullary nails).
Intramedullary nails or rods allow early weight bearing and functional use of the extremity. The intramedullary location of the nails
provides optimal biomechanical positioning to
resist torsion and bending (Ajmal, 2001).
Nails typically traverse a fracture and are often used as a rigid support for screws, pins, or other nails or rods used to fixate a fracture (Orthopedic Hardware Atlas). In many radiology practices the terms rod and nail are used interchangeably. Radiologists seem to favor the term rod while orthopedists favor the term nail.
In a purist sense, rods are simple solid cylinders which are thinner and more flexible than nails. For the purposes of this discussion, the terms nail and rod will be used interchangeably, but one should realize local custom often determines medical device terminology. Nails/rods have proximal and distal holes for the insertion of locking (interlocking) screws and pins that stabilize the nail in the bone and prevent rotation of the distal portion of the fractured bone on the proximal portion. Nails can be solid or hollow and come in a variety of cross-sections from round to square to star shaped (Orthopedic Hardware Atlas).
Most intramedullary nailing is done closed
with minimal soft-tissue exposure, either in an
antegrade or retrograde fashion depending on the
fracture site. Both antegrade and retrograde nailing
are used for femoral and humeral shaft fractures,
and for tibial shaft fractures antegrade nailing
is used. The entrance site for an antegrade
femoral nail is created in the piriformis fossa; for
the retrograde femoral nail, in the intercondylar
region; and for the antegrade tibial nail, anteriorly
just below the joint line.
The nails are introduced
over a guide wire, frequently after reaming with
flexible reamers to enlarge the intramedullary canal.
Because reaming causes temporary damage
to the internal cortical blood supply, which is associated
with increased infection rates, it is not
recommended for the treatment of some open
fractures. There is also an increased rate of pulmonary
complications including pulmonary embolism
with reaming; therefore, controversy persists
between those who recommend reamed nailing
and those who do not in severely traumatized
patients. Intramedullary nailing is performed with
intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance (Ruedi, 2007; Benjamin, 1994; Wiss, 2013; Berquist, 1995; Freiberg, 2001; Hunter, 2001; Ajmal, 2001; Oh, 2002).
Back to Top
Back to Top
Back to Top
|